Regency Construction, Inc. v. Department of Agriculture
This text of Regency Construction, Inc. v. Department of Agriculture (Regency Construction, Inc. v. Department of Agriculture) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
REGENCY CONSTRUCTION, INC., Appellant
v.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Appellee ______________________
2016-2600 ______________________
Appeal from the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals in Nos. 3246, 4356, Administrative Judge Marian Elizabeth Sullivan, Administrative Judge Jeri Kaylene Somers, Administrative Judge Joseph A. Vergilio. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
MATTHEW WAYNE WILLIS, Ashley Ashley & Arnold, Dyersburg, TN, argued for appellant. Also represented by SAMMIE LEO ARNOLD.
VITO SALVATORE SOLITRO, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by CHAD A. READLER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., DEBORAH A. BYNUM. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and REYNA, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
December 13, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Regency Construction, Inc. v. Department of Agriculture, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/regency-construction-inc-v-department-of-agriculture-cafc-2017.