Regas v. Regas

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Regas v. Regas

609 So. 2d 182, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13514, 1992 WL 379892

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 23, 1992

DocketNo. 92-0696

StatusPublished

This text of 609 So. 2d 182 (Regas v. Regas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Regas v. Regas, 609 So. 2d 182, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13514, 1992 WL 379892 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are unable to determine from the record whether appellee’s first wife received the $4,000 allegedly paid by appellant/second ex-wife as garnishee into the registry of the court. The documents tendered to the master were not authenticated nor do they answer the question of receipt or nonreceipt by the first wife. The trial judge took no testimony on the exception to the master’s report. Assuming such receipt took place, appellant would be entitled to relief.

[183]*183Accordingly, we reverse and remand the final judgment in favor of the appellee/ex-husband and remand, with direction to conduct an evidentiary hearing and make the required determination and enter final judgment consistent therewith.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We are unable to determine from the record whether appellee’s first wife received the $4,000 allegedly paid by appellant/second ex-wife as garnishee into the registry of the court. The documents tendered to the master were not authenticated nor do they answer the question of receipt or nonreceipt by the first wife. The trial judge took no testimony on the exception to the master’s report. Assuming such receipt took place, appellant would be entitled to relief.

[183]*183Accordingly, we reverse and remand the final judgment in favor of the appellee/ex-husband and remand, with direction to conduct an evidentiary hearing and make the required determination and enter final judgment consistent therewith.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

609 So. 2d 182, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13514, 1992 WL 379892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/regas-v-regas-fladistctapp-1992.