Regan v. Gurich
This text of 905 P.2d 796 (Regan v. Gurich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Motion to Supplement Record tendered by respondent/State Insurance Fund is granted.
Original jurisdiction is assumed. Let the writ of mandamus issue. The respondent/judge of the Workers’ Compensation Court is hereby directed to set for hearing the petitioner’s Motion to Reopen for change of condition for the worse in Court Number 92-14325A. The trial judge was in error when she denied the petitioner the status of a pauper solely on the basis of his being represented by counsel. The fact that the petitioner is represented by counsel does not in and of itself foreclose his right to proceed in forma pauperis. Okla. Const, art. II, § 6; Brown v. Burkett, 750 P.2d 481, 483 (Okla.1988); McMullin v. Department of Corrections, 863 P.2d 1187, 1189 (Okla.1993).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
905 P.2d 796, 1995 WL 610626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/regan-v-gurich-okla-1995.