Regan v. Gurich

905 P.2d 796, 1995 WL 610626
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedOctober 17, 1995
DocketNo. 86116
StatusPublished

This text of 905 P.2d 796 (Regan v. Gurich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Regan v. Gurich, 905 P.2d 796, 1995 WL 610626 (Okla. 1995).

Opinion

ORDER

The Motion to Supplement Record tendered by respondent/State Insurance Fund is granted.

Original jurisdiction is assumed. Let the writ of mandamus issue. The respondent/judge of the Workers’ Compensation Court is hereby directed to set for hearing the petitioner’s Motion to Reopen for change of condition for the worse in Court Number 92-14325A. The trial judge was in error when she denied the petitioner the status of a pauper solely on the basis of his being represented by counsel. The fact that the petitioner is represented by counsel does not in and of itself foreclose his right to proceed in forma pauperis. Okla. Const, art. II, § 6; Brown v. Burkett, 750 P.2d 481, 483 (Okla.1988); McMullin v. Department of Corrections, 863 P.2d 1187, 1189 (Okla.1993).

[797]*797ALMA WILSON, C.J., KAUGER, Y.C.J., HODGES, LAVENDER, SIMMS, HARGRAVE, OPALA and WATT, JJ., concur on Motion to Supplement Record and For Publication. SUMMERS, J., dissents on Motion to Supplement Record and For Publication.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. Burkett
1988 OK 13 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1988)
McMullin v. Department of Corrections
1993 OK 132 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
905 P.2d 796, 1995 WL 610626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/regan-v-gurich-okla-1995.