Regal Realty Co. v. Hamilton County Board of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Regal Realty Co. v. Hamilton County Board of Revision

169 Ohio St. (N.S.) 289

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 3, 1959·No. Nos. 35949 and 35950·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It does not appear from an examination of the records that the decisions of the Board of Tax Appeals are against the manifest weight of the evidence or are otherwise unlawful or unreasonable. The decisions are, therefore, affirmed.

Decisions affirmed.

Weygandt, 0. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and Peck, JJ., concur. Taet, J., concurs only in judgment with respect to case No. 85950.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

It does not appear from an examination of the records that the decisions of the Board of Tax Appeals are against the manifest weight of the evidence or are otherwise unlawful or unreasonable. The decisions are, therefore, affirmed.

Decisions affirmed.

Weygandt, 0. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and Peck, JJ., concur. Taet, J., concurs only in judgment with respect to case No. 85950.

Regal Realty Co. v. Hamilton County Board of Revision, 169 Ohio St. (N.S.) 289 (Ohio 1959).

Pincite

169 Ohio St. (N.S.) 289 (Regal Realty Co. v. Hamilton County Board of Revision) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.