Regal Games LLC v. SellerX Eight GmbH, et al.

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK eK REGAL GAMES LLC, : Plaintiff, : : 24-CV-4337 (VSB) - against - : : ORDER SELLERX EIGHT GmbH, et al., : Defendants. :

eK VERNON S. BRODERICK, United States District Judge: Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint on October 29, 2025. (See Doc. 33.) Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6.1(b), Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss was due on November 12, 2025. To date, however, Plaintiff has not filed an opposition to the motion to dismiss. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file any opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss no later than November 24, 2025. If Plaintiff fails to oppose Defendants’ motion to dismiss or otherwise submit any filing by that date, I will consider Defendants’ motion to dismiss to be unopposed. Cf McCall v. Pataki, 232 F.3d 321, 322-23 (2d Cir. 2000) (“If a complaint is sufficient to state a claim on which relief can be granted, the plaintiff’s failure to respond to a Rule 12(b)(6) motion does not warrant dismissal.”). SO ORDERED. Dated: November 17, 2025 i 0 New York, New York 6 MUST 12 Vernon S. Broderick United States District Judge