Regal-Beloit Corp. v. Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd.

620 F.3d 1167, 2012 A.M.C. 1199, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 18166, 2010 WL 3398149
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedAugust 31, 2010
Docket06-56831
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 620 F.3d 1167 (Regal-Beloit Corp. v. Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Regal-Beloit Corp. v. Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd., 620 F.3d 1167, 2012 A.M.C. 1199, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 18166, 2010 WL 3398149 (9th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER

In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. v. Regah-Beloit Corp., - U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 2433, 177 L.Ed.2d 424 (2010), the parties’ agreements are governed by the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act (“COGSA”), 46 U.S.C. § 30701 note, rather than by the Carmack Amendment, 49 U.S.C. § 11706. See Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, 130 S.Ct. at 2449. Therefore the parties are bound by the Tokyo forum selection clause contained in the bills of lading. The decision of the district court dismissing the instant case is affirmed.

Defendants-appellees are entitled to costs, as well as recovery of costs previously paid to plaintiffs-appellants.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Maersk Line A/S v. Carew
S.D. New York, 2022

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
620 F.3d 1167, 2012 A.M.C. 1199, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 18166, 2010 WL 3398149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/regal-beloit-corp-v-kawasaki-kisen-kaisha-ltd-ca9-2010.