Rega, J., Pet v. Hon.
This text of Rega, J., Pet v. Hon. (Rega, J., Pet v. Hon.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
JOAN MARY REGA, : No. 31 WM 2017 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : HON. FARLEY TOOTHMAN, GREEN : COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS; : SOUTHWESTERN AREA AGENCY ON : AGING, L.L.C., : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 22nd day of June, 2017, the Petition for Review in the Nature of
a Complaint in Mandamus is DENIED. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the
name of the jurist from the caption.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rega, J., Pet v. Hon., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rega-j-pet-v-hon-pa-2017.