Refugio Aguirre-Gomez v. Eric Holder, Jr.

444 F. App'x 182
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJuly 20, 2011
Docket10-72023
StatusUnpublished

This text of 444 F. App'x 182 (Refugio Aguirre-Gomez v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Refugio Aguirre-Gomez v. Eric Holder, Jr., 444 F. App'x 182 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Refugio Aguirre-Gomez, Miriam Aguirre, and their minor child, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. *183 § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Singh v. Gonzales, 491 F.3d 1090, 1095 (9th Cir.2007), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to reopen as untimely because the motion was filed 14 years after the September 8, 1995, deportation order, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and petitioners failed to establish the due diligence required for equitable tolling, see Singh, 491 F.3d at 1096-97.

We need not consider petitioners’ remaining contentions in light of our disposition.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
444 F. App'x 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/refugio-aguirre-gomez-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2011.