Refs v. Gray

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Refs v. Gray

1905 OK 55, 83 P. 719, 15 Okla. 484, 1905 Okla. LEXIS 62

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 5, 1905

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1905 OK 55 (Refs v. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Refs v. Gray, 1905 OK 55, 83 P. 719, 15 Okla. 484, 1905 Okla. LEXIS 62 (Okla. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion of the court by

Pancoast, J.:

Plaintiff in error brought an action to recover judgment against defendants in error' for breach of warranty of title to real estate. At the time of commencement of the action he sought aid by attachment, upon affidavit setting forth various grounds therefor. Shortly thereafter, he died an amended position, to which defendants below demurred. The demurrer was overruled, and the defendants in error filed their answer, and moved, also, to dissolve the attachment. Plaintiff replied, and upon these pleadings, trial was had. The court found “That the allegations of plaintiff’s petition are not supported by the evidence,” dissolved the attachments and rendered judgment for defendants below for costs. Upon the dissolution of the attachment, and the find *485 ing of the court against plaintiff upon the evidence, error is predicated.

The record before us is imperfect. The death of the stenographer who took the evidence, and the inability of plaintiff in error to procure a transcript of the evidence taken on the trial, are facts suggested in the petition in error, and an attempt is made to embrace in the case made a statement or abstract of the testimony given below. Aside from a recital in the petition in error that all the evidence in the case is preserved in the abstract thereof attached to the record, there is nowhere in the record itself a statement that all the evidence is incorporated therein. In fact, the record itself affirmatively shows that so much of the testimony given on the trial as was applicable to the question of fact raised by the verified denial of the correctness of the grounds for attachment is not here. A statement in the petition in error that all the evidence is preserved in the record is not sufficient to cure the omission of a recitation to that effect in the case made proper; and, in the absence of evidence vital to a consideration of the assignment of error, it is impossible for this court to decide disputed questions arising thereon, and following precedent we must decline to do so. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

Irwin, J., who presided in the court below not sitting; all the other Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion of the court by

Pancoast, J.:

Plaintiff in error brought an action to recover judgment against defendants in error' for breach of warranty of title to real estate. At the time of commencement of the action he sought aid by attachment, upon affidavit setting forth various grounds therefor. Shortly thereafter, he died an amended position, to which defendants below demurred. The demurrer was overruled, and the defendants in error filed their answer, and moved, also, to dissolve the attachment. Plaintiff replied, and upon these pleadings, trial was had. The court found “That the allegations of plaintiff’s petition are not supported by the evidence,” dissolved the attachments and rendered judgment for defendants below for costs. Upon the dissolution of the attachment, and the find *485 ing of the court against plaintiff upon the evidence, error is predicated.

The record before us is imperfect. The death of the stenographer who took the evidence, and the inability of plaintiff in error to procure a transcript of the evidence taken on the trial, are facts suggested in the petition in error, and an attempt is made to embrace in the case made a statement or abstract of the testimony given below. Aside from a recital in the petition in error that all the evidence in the case is preserved in the abstract thereof attached to the record, there is nowhere in the record itself a statement that all the evidence is incorporated therein. In fact, the record itself affirmatively shows that so much of the testimony given on the trial as was applicable to the question of fact raised by the verified denial of the correctness of the grounds for attachment is not here. A statement in the petition in error that all the evidence is preserved in the record is not sufficient to cure the omission of a recitation to that effect in the case made proper; and, in the absence of evidence vital to a consideration of the assignment of error, it is impossible for this court to decide disputed questions arising thereon, and following precedent we must decline to do so. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

Irwin, J., who presided in the court below not sitting; all the other Justices concurring.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1905 OK 55, 83 P. 719, 15 Okla. 484, 1905 Okla. LEXIS 62, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/refs-v-gray-okla-1905.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack