Refrigeration Supplies, Inc. v. Bartley
Opinions
1. The plaintiff was the co-payee of the checks drawn by one of defendants. The cashing bank and the drawee bank (also defendants in this case) paid these checks without the endorsement of the plaintiff. Thus, plaintiff was a damaged payee under the holding in Division 4 of Insurance Co. of N. A. v. Atlas Supply Co., 121 Ga. App. 1 (172 SE2d 632), which controls this case. It was error to grant the motions for summary judgment of defendants and their judgments are reversed.
2. There remain issues of fact with reference to the question of the amount of damages. Consequently, that part of the judgment denying the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is affirmed.
Judgment reversed in part and affirmed in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
240 S.E.2d 566 (Refrigeration Supplies, Inc. v. Bartley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.