Refractolite Corporation v. Prismo Holding Corporation
25 F. Supp. 965, 40 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 35, 1938 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1540
Opinion
I think it is too clear even for argument that such a case as this cannot be disposed of on motion for summary judgment under Rule 56, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. The issues involve the validity and alleged infringement of two unadjudicated patents, and such questions can only be adequately determined after a trial.
The motion for summary judgment is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Refractolite Corporation v. Prismo Holding Corporation, 25 F. Supp. 965, 40 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 35, 1938 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1540 (S.D.N.Y. 1938).
25 F. Supp. 965 (Refractolite Corporation v. Prismo Holding Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kollsman Instrument Corp. v. Astek Instrument Corp.
225 F. Supp. 534 (S.D. New York, 1964)
Servaas & Co. v. Dritz
185 F. Supp. 61 (S.D. New York, 1960)
Staffin Lewis Corp. v. Rose Derry Co.
9 F.R.D. 704 (D. Massachusetts, 1950)
E. W. Bliss Co. v. Cold Metal Process Co.
47 F. Supp. 897 (N.D. Ohio, 1942)
Meikle v. Timken-Detroit Axle Co.
44 F. Supp. 460 (E.D. Michigan, 1942)
Engineering Specialties Co. v. Burgess Battery Co.
40 F. Supp. 1014 (S.D. New York, 1941)
S. R. Leon, Inc. v. Parfums Schiaparelli, Inc.
35 F. Supp. 641 (S.D. New York, 1940)
Murphy v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.
112 F.2d 746 (Ninth Circuit, 1940)
Weil v. N. J. Richman Co.
34 F. Supp. 401 (S.D. New York, 1940)
Oltarsh v. Goodyear Fabrics Corp.
30 F. Supp. 265 (S.D. New York, 1939)
Kelleher v. Cohoes Trucking Co.
25 F. Supp. 965 (S.D. New York, 1938)