Refractolite Corporation v. Prismo Holding Corporation
This text of 25 F. Supp. 965 (Refractolite Corporation v. Prismo Holding Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
I think it is too clear even for argument that such a case as this cannot be disposed of on motion for summary judgment under Rule 56, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. The issues involve the validity and alleged infringement of two unadjudicated patents, and such questions can only be adequately determined after a trial.
The motion for summary judgment is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 F. Supp. 965, 40 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 35, 1938 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/refractolite-corporation-v-prismo-holding-corporation-nysd-1938.