Reforso, C., Mills v. M. N. Const. Co.
144 A. 877, 104 N.J. Eq. 219, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 514
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, KALISCH, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None. *Page 224
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reforso, C., Mills v. M. N. Const. Co., 144 A. 877, 104 N.J. Eq. 219, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 514 (N.J. 1929).
144 A. 877 (Reforso, C., Mills v. M. N. Const. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.