Reflex Ignition Co. v. Candler

133 S.E. 104, 35 Ga. App. 379, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 367
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 12, 1926
Docket17199
StatusPublished

This text of 133 S.E. 104 (Reflex Ignition Co. v. Candler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reflex Ignition Co. v. Candler, 133 S.E. 104, 35 Ga. App. 379, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 367 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and none of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial show cause for a reversal of the judgment below.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodtoorth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 S.E. 104, 35 Ga. App. 379, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reflex-ignition-co-v-candler-gactapp-1926.