Refac Intern., Ltd. v. IBM Corp.
This text of 904 F.2d 44 (Refac Intern., Ltd. v. IBM Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
REFAC INTERNATIONAL, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
IBM CORPORATION, NCR Corporation, Docutel Corporation,
Unisys Corporation, Diebold, Incorporated, and
Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company,
Defendants-Appellants.
No. 89-1462.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
April 18, 1990.
Before NIES and ARCHER, Circuit Judges, and EDWARD S. SMITH, Senior Circuit Judge.
ORDER
NIES, Circuit Judge.
Refac International, Ltd. moves to voluntarily dismiss its appeal without prejudice. IBM Corporation opposes the motion. NCR Corporation, Unisys Corporation, and Diebold, Incorporated oppose the motion.
Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The motion to dismiss without prejudice is granted.
(2) Each side is to bear its own costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
904 F.2d 44, 1990 WL 72110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/refac-intern-ltd-v-ibm-corp-cafc-1990.