Reeves v. Virginia Department of Correctional Education
This text of 63 F. App'x 165 (Reeves v. Virginia Department of Correctional Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Loretta Jane Reeves appeals the district court’s judgment granting the Appellees’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing her hostile work environment claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Reeves v. Virginia Dep’t of Corr. Educ., No. CA-02-20-2, 2003 WL 76117 (W.D.Va. Jan. 9, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 F. App'x 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reeves-v-virginia-department-of-correctional-education-ca4-2003.