Reeves v. Virginia Department of Correctional Education

Fourth Circuit

Reeves v. Virginia Department of Correctional Education

63 F. App'x 165

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 20, 2003·No. No. 03-1177·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Loretta Jane Reeves appeals the district court’s judgment granting the Appellees’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing her hostile work environment claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Reeves v. Virginia Dep’t of Corr. Educ., No. CA-02-20-2, 2003 WL 76117 (W.D.Va. Jan. 9, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Loretta Jane Reeves appeals the district court’s judgment granting the Appellees’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing her hostile work environment claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Reeves v. Virginia Dep’t of Corr. Educ., No. CA-02-20-2, 2003 WL 76117 (W.D.Va. Jan. 9, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reeves v. Virginia Department of Correctional Education, 63 F. App'x 165 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

63 F. App'x 165 (Reeves v. Virginia Department of Correctional Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.