Reeves v. United States

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Plaintiff, -against- 26 CIVIL 930 (GBD) JUDGMENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; CITY OF NEW YORK; CITY OF NEW YORK POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendants. wee K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated May 1, 2026, the Court has dismissed the complaint under the doctrine of sovereign immunity, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). The Court has denied Plaintiff's "Motion for Global Disclosure" (ECF 11) as moot. The Court has declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction of Plaintiff's state law claims. See 28 ULS.C. § 1367(c)(3). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 191 5(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Dated: New York, New York May 4, 2026 TAMMI M. HELLWIG Clerkof Court BY: dx MANGO Deputy Clerk