Reeves v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Reeves v. State

711 So. 2d 184, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5273, 1998 WL 236293

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 13, 1998

DocketNo. 98-0592

StatusPublished

This text of 711 So. 2d 184 (Reeves v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reeves v. State, 711 So. 2d 184, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5273, 1998 WL 236293 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the summary denial of her motion for posteonviction relief, filed pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm as to all points raised, except for one claim, which the state conceded, that the Uniform Commitment to Custody indicated that she had been habitualized on all her sentences. The record reflects that the judge who sentenced Appellant after trial on five of the seven counts charged in the information declined to sentence her as a habitual offender; the successor judge sentenced her as a habitual offender only on the two counts which had been severed and to which she entered a guilty plea subsequent to her sentencing for the five counts. Pursuant to the instant motion, the trial court has already reduced the conviction on one of those two counts to a misdemeanor and the sentence to time served.

Therefore, we reverse in part and direct the trial court on remand to amend the Uniform Commitment to Custody to reflect that Appellant has been declared a habitual offender as to the sentence imposed on count VI only. In all other respects, the order is affirmed.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED

DELL, POLEN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the summary denial of her motion for posteonviction relief, filed pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm as to all points raised, except for one claim, which the state conceded, that the Uniform Commitment to Custody indicated that she had been habitualized on all her sentences. The record reflects that the judge who sentenced Appellant after trial on five of the seven counts charged in the information declined to sentence her as a habitual offender; the successor judge sentenced her as a habitual offender only on the two counts which had been severed and to which she entered a guilty plea subsequent to her sentencing for the five counts. Pursuant to the instant motion, the trial court has already reduced the conviction on one of those two counts to a misdemeanor and the sentence to time served.

Therefore, we reverse in part and direct the trial court on remand to amend the Uniform Commitment to Custody to reflect that Appellant has been declared a habitual offender as to the sentence imposed on count VI only. In all other respects, the order is affirmed.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED

DELL, POLEN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

711 So. 2d 184, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5273, 1998 WL 236293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reeves-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.