Reeves v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Reeves v. State

388 So. 2d 1095, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17366

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reeves v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 366 So. 2d 1229 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 8, 1980·No. No. 79-1506·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no merit in appellant’s claim that the trial court erred in revoking his probation. However, we do agree that because the trial court found appellant guilty of two out of three alleged violations, an error occurred when the written order adjudicated the appellant guilty of all three violations.

Accordingly, the order of revocation is affirmed but the cause is remanded with directions that the finding that appellant was also guilty of violating his probation by leaving his employment without notification to his probation supervisor be stricken from the order.

LETTS, C. J., and ANSTEAD and HURLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We find no merit in appellant’s claim that the trial court erred in revoking his probation. However, we do agree that because the trial court found appellant guilty of two out of three alleged violations, an error occurred when the written order adjudicated the appellant guilty of all three violations.

Accordingly, the order of revocation is affirmed but the cause is remanded with directions that the finding that appellant was also guilty of violating his probation by leaving his employment without notification to his probation supervisor be stricken from the order.

LETTS, C. J., and ANSTEAD and HURLEY, JJ., concur.

Reeves v. State, 388 So. 2d 1095, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17366 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

388 So. 2d 1095 (Reeves v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.