Reeves v. State

506 So. 2d 1036, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 230, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 1861
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 7, 1987·No. No. 69548·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We review Reeves v. State, 495 So.2d 238 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986), because of express and direct conflict with Mestas v. State, 484 So.2d 612 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986), affd, 507 So.2d 587 (Fla.1987). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

In Mestas, we held that “community control is not to be considered as a nonstate prison sanction.” Slip op. at 2. We quash the decision of the district court below because it held that “community control is a nonstate prison sanction,” 495 So.2d at 239, and remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinion in Mestas.

It is so ordered.

McDonald, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reeves v. State, 506 So. 2d 1036, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 230, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 1861 (Fla. 1987).

506 So. 2d 1036 (Reeves v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Mestas
507 So. 2d 587 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)
Mestas v. State
484 So. 2d 612 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Reeves v. State
495 So. 2d 238 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)