Reeves v. State

116 Ala. 481
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedNovember 15, 1897
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 116 Ala. 481 (Reeves v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reeves v. State, 116 Ala. 481 (Ala. 1897).

Opinion

McCLELLAN, J.

The warrant of. arrest issued by a justice of the peace was properly made returnable to the criminal court of Pike county.— Walker v. State, 89 Ala. 74.

The names Patison and Patterson are, it would seem, idem sonans. — 16 Am. & Eng. Encyc. of Law, p. 122, note, p. 124; Taylor v. Rogers, 1 Ala. 197; Jackson v. Cody, 9 Cow. (N. Y.) 140; Petrie v. Woodworth, 3 Caine, (N.Y.), 219; Page v. State, 61 Ala. 16; Aaron v. State, 37 Ala. 106; Edmundson v. State, 17 Ala. 179; Gresham v. Walker, 10 Ala. 370. But whether so or not, it is manifest from the complaint in this case that the Hattie Patterson, who verified and subscribed it, was identical with the Hattie Patison who appeared before the officer and made it, and that the difference in the spelling of the name resulted from a mere clerical mistake of the person who wrote it.

There is no error in the. record, and the judgment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Red v. State
52 So. 885 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 Ala. 481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reeves-v-state-ala-1897.