Reeves v. St. Mary's County Commissioners
This text of 127 F. App'x 682 (Reeves v. St. Mary's County Commissioners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Elizabeth A. Reeves appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find that the district court properly dismissed the action as barred by res judicata. See Meekins v. United Transp. Union, 946 F.2d 1054, 1057-58 (4th Cir.1991). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Reeves v. St. Mary’s County Comm’rs, 268 F.Supp.2d 576 (D.Md.2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
127 F. App'x 682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reeves-v-st-marys-county-commissioners-ca4-2005.