Reeves v. Skenett
13 Ohio St. 574, 13 Ohio St. (N.S.) 574
Opinion
In this case certain mortgaged premises were sold under a decree of foreclosure and sale, and an order was made by the court of common pleas confirming such sale. From this order of confirmation the regular steps were taken for an. appeal to the district court. In that court a motion was made to dismiss the appeal on the ground that, by the statutes of the state as they now are, an appeal from an order confirming, or refusing to confirm, a sale, does not lie ; but that a petition in error furnishes the only mode of review.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reeves v. Skenett, 13 Ohio St. 574, 13 Ohio St. (N.S.) 574 (Ohio 1862).
13 Ohio St. 574 (Reeves v. Skenett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eaton v. Robison
192 N.E. 132 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1933)
Cleveland Trust Co. v. Cincinnati, Dayton & Toledo Traction Co.
9 Ohio App. 191 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1917)
Scheidler v. Newark & Granville Electric Street Railway Co.
20 Ohio C.C. 453 (Licking Circuit Court, 1900)
Scheidler v. Newark & Granville Electric St. Ry. Co.
11 Ohio Cir. Dec. 203 (Ohio Circuit Courts, 1900)
Browne v. Wallace
60 Ohio St. (N.S.) 177 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1899)
In re Assignment of the Norwood Park Co.
4 Ohio N.P. 240 (Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County, 1897)
McRoberts v. Lockwood
49 Ohio St. (N.S.) 374 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1892)
Harland v. Newcombe
2 Ohio C.C. 330 (Ohio Circuit Courts, 1887)