Reeves v. Scully
1 Walk. Ch. 340
This text of 1 Walk. Ch. 340 (Reeves v. Scully) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Reeves v. Scully, 1 Walk. Ch. 340 (Mich. Ct. App. 1844).
Opinion
Where a party applies for a re-taxation of costs, he must bring the question before the Court by petition or motion, specifying the items objected to as erroneously allowed by the taxing master. Or if there was irregularity in the taxation, — as the want of notice, or the like, — he must make a motion to have the taxation set aside on that account.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Walk. Ch. 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reeves-v-scully-michchanct-1844.