Reeves v. Scully
1 Walk. Ch. 248
This text of 1 Walk. Ch. 248 (Reeves v. Scully) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Reeves v. Scully, 1 Walk. Ch. 248 (Mich. Ct. App. 1843).
Opinion
The decree must be entered for the amount of the note and mortgage. Reeves, as bona fide endorsee of the note, was not affected by the equities existing between Hawkins and Scully. It would have been otherwise, if a bond, instead of a note, had been given with the mortgage.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Walk. Ch. 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reeves-v-scully-michchanct-1843.