Reeves v. Reeves

586 So. 2d 1345, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13966, 1991 WL 204597
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 14, 1991·No. No. 91-00225·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from a final judgment on remand, increasing the former husband’s monthly child support obligation. The former wife contends that the increase in child support should have been made retroactive to the date of the original final order. On cross appeal, the former husband contends that award should not have been increased.

We affirm. as to the increase in child support. However, the circumstances justifying the increased award existed on the date of the original final order. We therefore reverse and remand with instructions to make the award retroactive to the date of the original final order.

BOOTH, MINER and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reeves v. Reeves, 586 So. 2d 1345, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13966, 1991 WL 204597 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

586 So. 2d 1345 (Reeves v. Reeves) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller v. Miller
826 So. 2d 480 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Bardin v. State, Dept. of Revenue
720 So. 2d 609 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Kirkland v. Kirkland
618 So. 2d 295 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)