Reeves v. Reeves

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Reeves v. Reeves

586 So. 2d 1345, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13966, 1991 WL 204597

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 14, 1991

DocketNo. 91-00225

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 586 So. 2d 1345 (Reeves v. Reeves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reeves v. Reeves, 586 So. 2d 1345, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13966, 1991 WL 204597 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from a final judgment on remand, increasing the former husband’s monthly child support obligation. The former wife contends that the increase in child support should have been made retroactive to the date of the original final order. On cross appeal, the former husband contends that award should not have been increased.

We affirm. as to the increase in child support. However, the circumstances justifying the increased award existed on the date of the original final order. We therefore reverse and remand with instructions to make the award retroactive to the date of the original final order.

BOOTH, MINER and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from a final judgment on remand, increasing the former husband’s monthly child support obligation. The former wife contends that the increase in child support should have been made retroactive to the date of the original final order. On cross appeal, the former husband contends that award should not have been increased.

We affirm. as to the increase in child support. However, the circumstances justifying the increased award existed on the date of the original final order. We therefore reverse and remand with instructions to make the award retroactive to the date of the original final order.

BOOTH, MINER and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

586 So. 2d 1345, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13966, 1991 WL 204597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reeves-v-reeves-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack