Reeves v. Nuvox Communications, Inc.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2370

MICHAEL LADALE REEVES,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

NUVOX COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:08-cv-04031-HMH)

Submitted: June 17, 2010 Decided: June 23, 2010

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Ladale Reeves, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Edgar McDonald, III, John Timothy Merrell, Madison Baker Wyche, III, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael Ladale Reeves appeals the district court’s

order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant

Defendant’s summary judgment motion on his discrimination and

retaliation claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act of

1990, 42 U.S.C.A. § 12101 to § 12213 (West 2005 & Supp. 2010).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See

Reeves v. Nuvox Commc’ns, Inc., No. 6:08-cv-04031-HMH (D.S.C.

Nov. 18, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED