Reeves v. Johnson

928 P.2d 356, 145 Or. App. 162, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 1831
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedDecember 4, 1996
Docket95-04-27179-M; CA A89448
StatusPublished

This text of 928 P.2d 356 (Reeves v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reeves v. Johnson, 928 P.2d 356, 145 Or. App. 162, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 1831 (Or. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Relator, an inmate at the Snake River Correctional Institute (SRCI), appeals from a judgment dismissing his petition for an alternative writ of mandamus against the superintendent of the SCRI. We affirm.

For purposes of review, the circumstances in this case are identical to those in Haas v. Hathaway, 144 Or App 478, 928 P2d 331 (1996). Relator argues that ORS 137.3701 requires respondent to credit relator for the time that he spent in the sexual offender treatment program at the Oregon State Hospital as a condition of probation.2 We rejected that argument in Haas, explaining that “ORS 137.370 does not apply to time served as a condition of probation, no matter where that time is served.” Id. at 482. The trial court did not err.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Haas v. Hathaway
928 P.2d 331 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
928 P.2d 356, 145 Or. App. 162, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 1831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reeves-v-johnson-orctapp-1996.