Reeves v. Hatkinson

3 N.J.L. 751
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 15, 1811·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

— No doubt but that a judgment is a proper debt to be set-off; but a judgment or other debt to be set off, must be due the defendant in his own right; set-off is a contrivance to prevent cross actions, and thereby to save costs, trouble and expense. We are of opinion, that it ought to be such a debt as the defendant could bring an action for in his own name. We think to support this set-off, would be going further than the statute will warrant, or the adjudicated cases justify. Therefore, the plaintiff is entitled fo judgment for the sum found by the referees.

get-off of the assigned judgment over-ruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reeves v. Hatkinson, 3 N.J.L. 751 (N.J. 1811).

3 N.J.L. 751 (Reeves v. Hatkinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.