Reeves v. Goord
This text of 248 A.D.2d 994 (Reeves v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: In his petition, petitioner raises various [995]*995procedural arguments with respect to the maintenance of his urine sample, the chain of custody, his request for urinalysis, and irregularities concerning the testing of the urine sample. Although petitioner raised those arguments in his administrative appeal, he failed to raise them during the Tier III hearing and thus has failed to preserve them for judicial review. We decline to consider those arguments in the interest of justice. (CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
248 A.D.2d 994, 670 N.Y.S.2d 151, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3066, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reeves-v-goord-nyappdiv-1998.