Reeves v. Frost
This text of 48 N.Y.S. 1113 (Reeves v. Frost) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
No opinion. Judgment of the county court of Oswego county reversed, with costs, and the judgment of the justice’s court affirmed, with costs. Held, that there was some evidence in the justice’s court tending to support the verdict of the jury, and the county court improperly reversed the justice’s judgment. See Schoonmaker v. Spencer, 54 N. Y. 366; Halsey v. Hart, 85 Hun, 46, 32 N. Y. Supp. 665; City of Brooklyn v. Brooklyn City & N. R. Co., 11 App. Div. 168, 42 N. Y. Supp. 371; Staples v. Hager, 11 App. Div. 631, 42 N. Y. Supp. 458; Fandel v. Railroad Co., 15 App. Div. 426, 44 N. Y. Supp. 462; Ludlum v Couch, 10 App. Div. 603, 42 N. Y. Supp. 370; Rogers v. Ackerman, 22 Barb. 134. All concur, except GREEN, J., not voting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 N.Y.S. 1113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reeves-v-frost-nyappdiv-1897.