Reeves v. Erie Lackawanna Railroad

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Reeves v. Erie Lackawanna Railroad

56 Misc. 2d 575, 289 N.Y.S.2d 663, 68 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2719, 1968 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1856

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided January 4, 1968·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In our opinion the court was without jurisdiction in this action to recover wages lost as a result of job elimination, and severance pay after voluntary termination of employment, under a collective bargaining agreement between their union and the defendant railroad.

Under subdivision (i) of section 3 of the Bailway Labor Act (U. S. Code, tit. 45, § 153, subd. [i]) such disputes between an employee and a carrier are within the jurisdiction of the National Bailroad Adjustment Board, and plaintiffs are required to resort to that agency for adjudication of their claims (Pennsylvania R. R. Co. v. Day, 360 U. S. 548; Roberts v. Lehigh & New England Ry. Co., 211 F. Supp. 379). There being no allegation of wrongful discharge, it was error to apply the rule of Moore v. Illinois Cent. R. R. Co. (312 U. S. 630) and Walker v. Southern Ry. Co. (385 U. S. 196); and the trend toward requir[576]*576ing exhaustion of administrative procedures (Republic Steel v. Maddox, 379 U. S. 650) requires that the rule in Moore not be extended.

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction granted.

Concur — Markowitz, J. P., Hofstadter and Street, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In our opinion the court was without jurisdiction in this action to recover wages lost as a result of job elimination, and severance pay after voluntary termination of employment, under a collective bargaining agreement between their union and the defendant railroad.

Under subdivision (i) of section 3 of the Bailway Labor Act (U. S. Code, tit. 45, § 153, subd. [i]) such disputes between an employee and a carrier are within the jurisdiction of the National Bailroad Adjustment Board, and plaintiffs are required to resort to that agency for adjudication of their claims (Pennsylvania R. R. Co. v. Day, 360 U. S. 548; Roberts v. Lehigh & New England Ry. Co., 211 F. Supp. 379). There being no allegation of wrongful discharge, it was error to apply the rule of Moore v. Illinois Cent. R. R. Co. (312 U. S. 630) and Walker v. Southern Ry. Co. (385 U. S. 196); and the trend toward requir[576]*576ing exhaustion of administrative procedures (Republic Steel v. Maddox, 379 U. S. 650) requires that the rule in Moore not be extended.

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction granted.

Concur — Markowitz, J. P., Hofstadter and Street, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.

Reeves v. Erie Lackawanna Railroad, 56 Misc. 2d 575, 289 N.Y.S.2d 663, 68 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2719, 1968 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1856 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

56 Misc. 2d 575 (Reeves v. Erie Lackawanna Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related