Reeves v. Converse
114 A.D. 915
Opinion
All concurred, except Kruse, J., who dissented and voted for modification of the judgment by striking out the provision requiring delivery of possession of the real estate to the receiver and also the provision which absolutely sets aside the deed and cancels the same of record. (See Harris v. Osnowitz, 35 App. Div. 594, and Moyer v. Moyer, 7 id. 528.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reeves v. Converse, 114 A.D. 915 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).
114 A.D. 915 (Reeves v. Converse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harris v. Osnowitz
35 A.D. 594 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)