Reeves Grocery Co. v. Thompson

63 So. 187, 105 Miss. 729
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1913
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 63 So. 187 (Reeves Grocery Co. v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reeves Grocery Co. v. Thompson, 63 So. 187, 105 Miss. 729 (Mich. 1913).

Opinion

Cook, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

It is contended that the judgment upon which the garnishment was based is void, and for this reason the peremptory instruction for claimants was proper. We are of opinion that this contention is unsound. The service of the summons is irregular only, and of this claimants could not complain.

After a careful reading of. the entire record, we think the court should not have given the peremptory instruption, but should have submitted to the decision of. the jury the bona fides of the alleged assignment to claimants of the debt in controversy; but for obvious reasons, we refrain from any criticism of the evidence in support .of the assignment.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reed v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.
87 So. 2d 95 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1956)
McEwen v. Sterling State Bank
5 S.W.2d 702 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 So. 187, 105 Miss. 729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reeves-grocery-co-v-thompson-miss-1913.