Reeve v. Reeve
279 A.D. 618, 107 N.Y.S.2d 979, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3209
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 29, 1951·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
(Cf. Henning v. Henning, 272 App. Div. 676; De Robertis V. De Robertis, 254 App. Div. 811; Davis v. Davis, 195 App. Div. 430; Botway v. Botway, 273 App. Div. 948.) Although we do not regard such recitals as a determination of the issues involved, nor as binding in any respect on the court which will try the issues, they are redundant and unnecessary. (Cf. White v. White, 175 Misc. 66.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reeve v. Reeve, 279 A.D. 618, 107 N.Y.S.2d 979, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3209 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).
279 A.D. 618 (Reeve v. Reeve) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brock v. Brook
1 A.D.2d 973 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)
Brock v. Brock
3 Misc. 2d 467 (New York Supreme Court, 1955)
Sullivan v. Sullivan
285 A.D. 967 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)