Reeve v. Lee
This text of 6 Wis. 80 (Reeve v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court,
There is manifestly a variance between the names of the plaintiffs, as set forth in the complaint, and in some of the subsequent proceedings in this cause. In the complaint the plaintiffs are named as Thomas T. Eeeve [84]*84and George W. Boe, while the judgment is in favor of Thomas T. Reeve and Gilbert W. Boe. This is a mistake which the Circuit Court would have an undoubted right to correct on a proper motion, but we do not think we have any authority to correct it. And it must be very obvious that it is for the interest and safety of all parties that the mistake should be corrected in the records of the Circuit Court. We therefore deem it advisable and proper to reverse the judgment and send the case back to the Circuit Court, to give that court an opportunity of correcting the irregularity in the premises. The other objections taken by the counsel for the appellants are sufficiently noticed in the case of Haertell against these same parties, decided the present term.
Judgment of the Circuit Court reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 Wis. 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reeve-v-lee-wis-1858.