Reeve, O. v. CCP Phl County

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 22, 2016·No. 97 EM 2016·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

OMAR REEVE, : No. 97 EM 2016 :

Petitioner :

: :

v. :

: :

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, :

:

Respondent :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of August, 2016, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process and the Petition for Review in the Nature of a Complaint in Mandamus

are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (explaining that

hybrid representation is not permitted). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the

filings to counsel of record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reeve, O. v. CCP Phl County, (Pa. 2016).

Reeve, O. v. CCP Phl County (Reeve, O. v. CCP Phl County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Ali
10 A.3d 282 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2010)