Reeva A.C. v. Richard C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Reeva A.C. v. Richard C.

84 A.D.3d 521, 921 N.Y.S.2d 857

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 12, 2011

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 84 A.D.3d 521 (Reeva A.C. v. Richard C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reeva A.C. v. Richard C., 84 A.D.3d 521, 921 N.Y.S.2d 857 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Diane Kiesel, J.), entered on or about April 30, 2009, which, after a hearing, granted a final or[522]*522der of custody to respondent mother, with visitation to petitioner grandmother and respondent father, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s determination that it was in the best interests of the children to grant custody to respondent mother has a sound and substantial basis in the record. The court clearly examined and weighed numerous factors, relying on no single factor, including the quality of the home environment, the ability of each party to provide for the children’s emotional and intellectual growth, and the relative fitness of each parent (see Matter of China S. [Tonia J. — Levon S.], 77 AD3d 568 [2010]). Concur — Gonzalez, PJ., Tom, Andrias, Moskowitz and Freedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Diane Kiesel, J.), entered on or about April 30, 2009, which, after a hearing, granted a final or[522]*522der of custody to respondent mother, with visitation to petitioner grandmother and respondent father, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s determination that it was in the best interests of the children to grant custody to respondent mother has a sound and substantial basis in the record. The court clearly examined and weighed numerous factors, relying on no single factor, including the quality of the home environment, the ability of each party to provide for the children’s emotional and intellectual growth, and the relative fitness of each parent (see Matter of China S. [Tonia J. — Levon S.], 77 AD3d 568 [2010]). Concur — Gonzalez, PJ., Tom, Andrias, Moskowitz and Freedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 A.D.3d 521, 921 N.Y.S.2d 857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reeva-ac-v-richard-c-nyappdiv-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack