Reeser v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.
This text of 64 A. 376 (Reeser v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The learned judge below found that the agreement with Ruth was valid as to him and binding on the Philadelphia & Reading Railroad Company as the successor of the Lebanon Valley Railroad Company, the original party. But he also found that Krick, the other defendant, as an adjoining landowner, had a statutory right to connect with the railroad by a switch or siding of which he could not be deprived by any agreement of the railroad with a third party.
The judgment is affirmed on so much of his opinion as covers this branch of the case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
64 A. 376, 215 Pa. 136, 1906 Pa. LEXIS 750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reeser-v-philadelphia-reading-railway-co-pa-1906.