Reeser v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.

64 A. 376, 215 Pa. 136, 1906 Pa. LEXIS 750

Opinion

Per Curtam,

The learned judge below found that the agreement with Ruth was valid as to him and binding on the Philadelphia & Reading Railroad Company as the successor of the Lebanon Valley Railroad Company, the original party. But he also found that Krick, the other defendant, as an adjoining landowner, had a statutory right to connect with the railroad by a switch or siding of which he could not be deprived by any agreement of the railroad with a third party.

The judgment is affirmed on so much of his opinion as covers this branch of the case.