Reeser v. DFS
This text of Reeser v. DFS (Reeser v. DFS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
BRUCE REESER, § § No. 164, 2018 Respondent Below, § Appellant, § § v. § Court Below—Family Court § of the State of Delaware JASMINE OPHELIA, TODD § GONSER, and DIVISION OF § File Nos. CK17-04022, FAMILY SERVICES, § CK16-01241 and CK14-02905 § Pet. Nos. 17-36415, 16-03960 Petitioners Below, § and 14-32887 Appellees. §
Submitted: July 20, 2018 Decided: July 24, 2018
ORDER
It appears to the Court that, on July 5, 2018, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a
notice to the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for his
failure to diligently prosecute the appeal by not filing his opening brief and appendix
in this matter. The appellant has failed to respond to the notice to show cause within
the required ten-day period; therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to be
unopposed.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, under Supreme Court
Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr. Chief Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Reeser v. DFS, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reeser-v-dfs-del-2018.