Reese v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Reese v. State

493 S.W.3d 37, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 652, 2016 WL 3538408

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 28, 2016·No. WD 78725·Published

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam:

Delmario R. Reese appeals from the Judgment of the Circuit Court of Livingston County, Missouri, denying his Rule 29.15 amended -motion for post-conviction relief, ■ based on ineffective assistance of trial counsel, after an evidentiary hearing. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law' [38] has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam:

Delmario R. Reese appeals from the Judgment of the Circuit Court of Livingston County, Missouri, denying his Rule 29.15 amended -motion for post-conviction relief, ■ based on ineffective assistance of trial counsel, after an evidentiary hearing. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law' [38] has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Reese v. State, 493 S.W.3d 37, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 652, 2016 WL 3538408 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

493 S.W.3d 37 (Reese v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.