Reese v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Reese v. State

493 S.W.3d 37, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 652, 2016 WL 3538408

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 28, 2016

DocketWD 78725

StatusPublished

This text of 493 S.W.3d 37 (Reese v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reese v. State, 493 S.W.3d 37, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 652, 2016 WL 3538408 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam:

Delmario R. Reese appeals from the Judgment of the Circuit Court of Livingston County, Missouri, denying his Rule 29.15 amended -motion for post-conviction relief, ■ based on ineffective assistance of trial counsel, after an evidentiary hearing. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law' [38]*38has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam:

Delmario R. Reese appeals from the Judgment of the Circuit Court of Livingston County, Missouri, denying his Rule 29.15 amended -motion for post-conviction relief, ■ based on ineffective assistance of trial counsel, after an evidentiary hearing. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law' [38]*38has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

493 S.W.3d 37, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 652, 2016 WL 3538408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reese-v-state-moctapp-2016.