Reese v. State
971 So. 2d 962, 2007 WL 4577391
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reese v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 899 So. 2d 428 →
Opinion
Alphonso REESE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Alphonso Reese, South Bay, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Comer v. Moore, 817 So.2d 784 (Fla.2002); Allen v. State, 768 So.2d 1168, 1169 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (citing Clements v. State, 761 So.2d 1245 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)); Sanchez v. State, 765 So.2d 246, 247 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).
GUNTHER, KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reese v. State, 971 So. 2d 962, 2007 WL 4577391 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).
971 So. 2d 962 (Reese v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sanchez v. State
765 So. 2d 246 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Allen v. State
768 So. 2d 1168 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Clements v. State
761 So. 2d 1245 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Comer v. Moore
817 So. 2d 784 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)