Reese v. State

771 So. 2d 1266, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14898, 2000 WL 1700179
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reese v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 763 So. 2d 537
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 15, 2000·No. No. 2D99-2791·Published

Opinion

WHATLEY, Judge.

In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Kimball E. Reese challenges his convictions in eight cases. Our independent review of the record reveals no ground for reversal. However, the public defender has drawn our attention to the fact that the trial court failed to sentence Reese on his misdemeanor convictions in case nos. 98-695 and 98-697.

Accordingly, we remand with directions that the trial court sentence Reese in case nos. 98-695 and 98-697.

Convictions affirmed; remanded with directions.

NORTHCUTT and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reese v. State, 771 So. 2d 1266, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14898, 2000 WL 1700179 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

771 So. 2d 1266 (Reese v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)