Reese v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Reese v. State

592 So. 2d 326, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 203, 1992 WL 276

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 3, 1992

DocketNo. 91-3068

StatusPublished

This text of 592 So. 2d 326 (Reese v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reese v. State, 592 So. 2d 326, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 203, 1992 WL 276 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We accept jurisdiction of this late-filed appeal since the trial court did not state in its order denying post-conviction relief that the movant had a right to appeal within thirty days of rendition of the order. See Rule 3.850(f), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure; State ex rel. Shevin v. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District, 316 So.2d 50 (Fla.1975); Cox v. State, 583 So.2d 822 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

We have considered appellant’s argument on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err when it denied his motion for post-conviction relief. Accordingly we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

DELL, GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI