Reese v. Smyth

New York Supreme Court

Reese v. Smyth

32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 646

DecidedDecember 15, 1881

StatusPublished

This text of 32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 646 (Reese v. Smyth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reese v. Smyth, 32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 646 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1881).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to dismiss appeal of Hartwell and others denied, without costs. Motion to dismiss appeal of Walls and others denied, -without costs. Motion to dismiss appeal of Russell, receiver, denied, without costs. Motion by defendant Boese to dismiss appeal of Russell denied, without costs. Judgment affirmed as to appellants Boese and Russell, receivers, with costs against each. Judgment affirmed as to Bernhard. Modified as to Glasson and Mengenthorn, without costs. Modified as to Levy, Freeman and Palmer, with costs to them. Modified as to those appellants who held policies in the New York Company, and who have paid premiums to the New Haven Company after the transfer without surrender of the old policy, affirmed in other respects. Order granting allowance affirmed. Order to be settled by Barnard, P. J. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.;

Gilbert, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to dismiss appeal of Hartwell and others denied, without costs. Motion to dismiss appeal of Walls and others denied, -without costs. Motion to dismiss appeal of Russell, receiver, denied, without costs. Motion by defendant Boese to dismiss appeal of Russell denied, without costs. Judgment affirmed as to appellants Boese and Russell, receivers, with costs against each. Judgment affirmed as to Bernhard. Modified as to Glasson and Mengenthorn, without costs. Modified as to Levy, Freeman and Palmer, with costs to them. Modified as to those appellants who held policies in the New York Company, and who have paid premiums to the New Haven Company after the transfer without surrender of the old policy, affirmed in other respects. Order granting allowance affirmed. Order to be settled by Barnard, P. J. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.;

Gilbert, J., not sitting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reese-v-smyth-nysupct-1881.