Reese v. Slater

598 F. App'x 853
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 20, 2015
DocketNo. 15-6098
StatusPublished

This text of 598 F. App'x 853 (Reese v. Slater) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reese v. Slater, 598 F. App'x 853 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Edward' Reese appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) civil rights action for failure to exhaust his available administrative remedies. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Reese’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Reese has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
598 F. App'x 853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reese-v-slater-ca4-2015.