Reese v. Shepherd

27 Ga. 226
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 1859
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 27 Ga. 226 (Reese v. Shepherd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reese v. Shepherd, 27 Ga. 226 (Ga. 1859).

Opinion

By the Court.

Benning, J.

delivering the opinion.

The Statute says, “And if any such process shall be delivered to the Sheriff, or other officer, whose duty it shall be to execute the same, so late, that it cannot be served in manner aforesaid, twenty days before the sitting of the Court to which it shall be returnable, such process shall not be executed, but the officer shall return the same with the truth of the case.” Pr. Dig., 420.

Shall not be executed — these are the peremptory words of the Statute.

The Statute, then goes on to say, that all process issued and returned in any other manner than that” therein before “ directed shall be” “ null and void.”

These latter words, then, apply to this case, and when they do apply to a case, they render the whole proceeding a nulli[228]*228ty. So it has ever been held. See Ingram vs. Little, 16 Ga. Rep., 194.

This case is much stronger than that, for in this, there was no appearance by the defendants.

But I must say, that, I think, if there is one Statute that needs amendment, it is this one in relation to the issue and return of process.

We regret being compelled, as we think, we are, to reverse the judgment.

Judgment reversed.

McDonald J. absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mason v. Royal Indemnity Co.
123 F.2d 335 (Fifth Circuit, 1941)
Green v. Spires
7 S.E.2d 246 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 Ga. 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reese-v-shepherd-ga-1859.