Reese v. Science Applications International Corp. Information Services-Reserve Component Automation System

13 F. App'x 205
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 19, 2001
DocketNo. 00-2175
StatusPublished

This text of 13 F. App'x 205 (Reese v. Science Applications International Corp. Information Services-Reserve Component Automation System) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reese v. Science Applications International Corp. Information Services-Reserve Component Automation System, 13 F. App'x 205 (4th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

William L. Reese appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Science Applications International Corporation, Inc. (“SAIC”), as to his claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000), and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (1994). We have reviewed the briefs, the record, and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Reese v. Science Applications Int’l Corp., No. CA 99-1167-A (E.D.Va. July 27, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Definitions
42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 F. App'x 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reese-v-science-applications-international-corp-information-ca4-2001.