Reese v. Reese
This text of 268 A.D. 993 (Reese v. Reese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In at action for separation, in which the appellant interposed a defense that, he had obtained a Florida decree of divorce, judgment in favor of the plaintiff unanimously affirmed, with costs. The weight of the evidence supports the finding of Special Term that the appellant, when he brought his action for divorce in Florida, was not domiciled there. The decree, based upon constructive service only, was, therefore, not entitled to recognition. (Bell v. Bell, 181 U. S. 175; Matter of IAndgren, 293 N. Y. 18; Matter of Bingham, 265 App. Div. 463, motion for leave to appeal denied, 290 N. Y. 929.) Present — Close, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Lewis and Aldrich, JJ. [See 179 Misc. 665.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
268 A.D. 993, 51 N.Y.S.2d 685, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reese-v-reese-nyappdiv-1944.