Reese v. Reese

268 A.D. 993, 51 N.Y.S.2d 685, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4600
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 4, 1944·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

In at action for separation, in which the appellant interposed a defense that, he had obtained a Florida decree of divorce, judgment in favor of the plaintiff unanimously affirmed, with costs. The weight of the evidence supports the finding of Special Term that the appellant, when he brought his action for divorce in Florida, was not domiciled there. The decree, based upon constructive service only, was, therefore, not entitled to recognition. (Bell v. Bell, 181 U. S. 175; Matter of IAndgren, 293 N. Y. 18; Matter of Bingham, 265 App. Div. 463, motion for leave to appeal denied, 290 N. Y. 929.) Present — Close, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Lewis and Aldrich, JJ. [See 179 Misc. 665.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reese v. Reese, 268 A.D. 993, 51 N.Y.S.2d 685, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4600 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

268 A.D. 993 (Reese v. Reese) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harges v. Harges
21 Misc. 2d 59 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Le Gault v. Le Gault
9 Misc. 2d 82 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)
Benedict v. Benedict
203 Misc. 286 (New York Family Court, 1952)
Morton v. Morton
199 Misc. 547 (New York Family Court, 1950)
Urquhart v. Urquhart
196 Misc. 664 (New York Supreme Court, 1949)
Zekowski v. Zekowski
191 Misc. 914 (New York Supreme Court, 1948)
Lapin v. Lapin
190 Misc. 31 (New York Supreme Court, 1947)
Pomerance v. Pomerance
187 Misc. 20 (New York Supreme Court, 1946)
Kurski v. Kurski
185 Misc. 97 (New York Family Court, 1945)
Marshall v. Marshall
157 P.2d 854 (California Court of Appeal, 1945)