Reese v. Pokorski

242 A.D.2d 858, 662 N.Y.S.2d 334, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10376
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 30, 1997·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly dismissed petitioner’s application to invalidate a petition designating Patrick C. Pokorski (respondent) as a candidate for the Town of Lancaster Highway Superintendent in the Republican primary. Petitioner failed to meet his burden of establishing fraud by clear and convincing evidence (see, Simcuski v Saeli, 44 NY2d 442, 452). Respondent’s attesting to five signatures when not in proximity with the signers did not warrant the inference that fraud permeated the entire petition (see, Matter of Quinones v Bass, 45 NY2d 811). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Sedita, Jr., J.—Election Law.) Present—Green, J. P., Wisner, Doerr, Balio and Boehm, JJ. (Filed Aug. 20, 1997.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reese v. Pokorski, 242 A.D.2d 858, 662 N.Y.S.2d 334, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10376 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

242 A.D.2d 858 (Reese v. Pokorski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Duck v. Mannion
2018 NY Slip Op 5894 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)