Reese v. Pennsylvanians for Union Reform

169 A.3d 2, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 2549
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 10, 2016·No. 82 MM 2016·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 10th day of November, 2016, it is hereby ordered that:

1. The Petition for Review is GRANTED.

2. The appeal at 82 MM 2016 is hereby consolidated with the appeals at 42 MAP 2016 and 43 MAP 2016.

3.The parties are hereby directed to file supplemental briefs addressing the impact of Pa. State Educ. Ass’n v. Dept. of Cmty. and Econ. Dev., 148 A.3d 142, 2016 WL 6087684 (Pa. 2016) on the consolidated appeals.

Chief Justice Saylor files a dissenting statement in which Justice Mundy joins.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reese v. Pennsylvanians for Union Reform, 169 A.3d 2, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 2549 (Pa. 2016).

169 A.3d 2 (Reese v. Pennsylvanians for Union Reform) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Balfour Beatty v. Penn Patriot Ins., Aplt.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2025